As with confidentiality agreements, the simple answer is “no,” but it`s not just about the application. Apart from these standard titles, I encountered some slight deviations. “Confidentiality agreement” is of course the most well-known term after the title of NOA. “Non-Disclosure Agreement” is the standard title of a contract designed to protect against the disclosure of confidential information and trade secrets. One way or another, in order for many subcontractors to perform their role satisfactorily, they need access to some of your confidential information. You may need to check your client list, check your financial statements, or learn more about your pending patent. Before you give them access, you implement a confidentiality agreement. In return for the e-title application™ the Electronic Title User Agreement provides the legal basis for creating and transferring electronic title documents and gives users the confidence to remove paper from the process. Moreover, this title also seems more appropriate for third-party and subcontractor situations, in which the revealing party attempts to attach it to secrecy when trade secrets are necessarily disclosed, such as price information, patents, inventions, etc. The conclusion of the letter to amend or renew an existing agreement should not relate to the agreement in question, since the amended or extended agreement would be defined in the first sentence. The term “non-disclosure agreement” is also preferred as a title for single-use agreements in which only one party is bound by the promise of confidentiality because it is the only one to receive confidential information. This is probably also the reason why the term “confidentiality agreement” is used for this type of legal arrangement more common in employment contracts and personal situations, such as mergers or partnership negotiations.
Revised agreements. Sometimes a treaty no longer reflects the way the parties collaborate or are so often modified that the overview is scattered in various amendments or additions. Similarly, long-term agreements, such as successful joint ventures, sometimes provide for renegotiation after a first term. In these circumstances, it may be desirable both to review the whole agreement and to stress that existing trade relations continue without inconsistencies or interruptions. To emphasize consistency with current practice, new agreements will receive a suffix in their title (z.B. Restated Joint Venture Agreement). For example, redefining a joint enterprise agreement would emphasize that the parties are committed to a high level of loyal faith, rooted in a historically exceptional level of mutual trust. Similarly, a redefinition may support discussions with a third party, namely that a contractual agreement after the sale is in fact the continuation of undocumented intra-company transactions. The agreement is multilateral – all parties are signatories. It provides the legal basis for the transmission of bill of lading with electronic™ titles. It also ensures that the underlying transport contract remains as if the paper consoles were used.
The title “Non-Disclosure Agreement” is perhaps the best known, recognizable by its commonly used abbreviation (“NDA”). While there does not appear to be a hard and quick rule that dictates the title of your confidentiality agreement, there are a small handful of established and respected titles, and I have not yet found any evidence that it is appropriate to divert attention from them.